Read Our Previous Blog In Our Path Forward Series
Discover how charity CIOs can champion user empowerment, from nurturing a user-centric IT culture to implementing robust training programmes and much more.
Interested in our Cybersecurity Framework?
Visit our article on how to organise an effective cybersecurity strategy to download a copy of our framework.
Award-Winning IT Services
Discover why we were named one of Britain’s 50 Best Managed IT Companies Award 2025, and how it reflects our continued focus on strong leadership and operational excellence.
The Importance of Robust Governance for London Charities
For charities operating in London and the Greater London area, strong governance, compliance, and risk management are not just administrative formalities. With increased public and regulatory scrutiny and heightened cyber threats, trustees and senior leaders must be proactive in meeting legal obligations, safeguarding assets, and protecting reputation.
The Charity Commission’s guidance, The Essential Trustee: What You Need to Know, What You Need to Do, outlines the core legal duties that trustees must understand and uphold, including acting in the charity’s best interests and managing resources responsibly. Poor governance can lead to:
- Loss of public trust
- Withdrawal of grant funding
- Regulatory action or statutory inquiry
- Reputational damage that disproportionately affects local charities
Trustees are legally responsible for ensuring good governance, even when day-to-day operations are delegated.
Legal and Ethical Obligations: Upholding Charity Law and Ethical Standards
UK charity trustees must comply with the Charities Act 2011 and act in line with Charity Commission expectations. This includes:
- Acting in the charity’s best interests
- Managing resources responsibly
- Exercising reasonable care and skill
- Avoiding conflicts of interest
In practice, governance failures often arise not from bad intent, but from:
- Trustees lacking confidence to challenge decisions
- Over-reliance on a single senior leader or supplier
- Limited understanding of digital and data-related risks
For example, a London charity migrates to Microsoft 365 but trustees never receive assurance on data access controls or retention policies. A subsequent data breach exposes beneficiary information, a governance issue, not just an IT failure.
The Charity Commission expects trustees to understand enough about key risks to ask the right questions, even if they are not technical experts.
Regulatory Compliance: Navigating the Charity Commission, GDPR, and Other Regulations
Regulatory compliance for UK charities spans several oversight bodies, including the Charity Commission for England and Wales, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Fundraising Regulator, and relevant employment and safeguarding authorities. Charities are required to submit accurate annual returns and accounts, report serious incidents promptly, and demonstrate effective internal controls and risk management, with failure to report incidents – including cyber security breaches – itself capable of triggering regulatory scrutiny.
The Charity Commission provides clear guidance on serious incident reporting, emphasising timely and transparent disclosure (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-report-a-serious-incident-in-your-charity). Alongside this, charities routinely handle sensitive personal data relating to beneficiaries, donors, volunteers, and staff, making compliance with UK GDPR critical. This includes ensuring lawful data processing, implementing appropriate security controls, maintaining clear data retention policies, and reporting breaches within statutory timeframes. The scale of the risk is significant: government-backed research shows that around 30% of charities experienced a cyber security breach or attack in the past year, with phishing remaining the most common cause.
For London and Greater London charities in particular, hybrid working models, shared devices, and widespread volunteer access materially increase data protection risk. While GDPR fines for charities are relatively rare, regulatory enforcement action, public reprimands, and reputational damage are far more common and can have lasting consequences for trust, funding, and service delivery.
Risk Management: The Role of Risk Registers, Audits, and Board Reporting
Effective risk management enables charities to anticipate, evaluate, and mitigate threats to their objectives. A comprehensive risk register is vital, capturing financial, reputational, operational, and strategic risks. The register should be a living document, regularly reviewed and updated in board meetings. Independent audits – both financial and operational – offer an objective assessment of controls, compliance, and performance. Board reporting should be clear and focused, highlighting key risks, mitigation actions, and outcomes. Embedding risk management into the charity’s culture ensures that everyone is alert to potential issues and empowered to respond.
Effective risk management means:
- Identifying strategic, operational, financial, digital, and reputational risks
- Assessing likelihood and impact realistically
- Assigning ownership and mitigation actions
- Reviewing risks at every board meeting
For example, a charity delivering services across Greater London identifies reliance on a single cloud provider as a risk. Mitigation includes backup testing, supplier assurance, and cyber insurance, all reported to the board.
The Charity Commission expects boards to demonstrate ongoing engagement with risk, not annual sign-off.
The CIO’s Role: Leadership in Governance and Strategic Risk Mitigation
For charities with 30 – 400 users, the CIO or senior IT lead plays a critical role in organisational governance, typically holding responsibility for cyber security and resilience, GDPR compliance, digital supplier management, and business continuity planning.
Despite this, CIOs are still frequently excluded from strategic governance discussions, limiting board visibility of emerging technology risks. This gap can have serious consequences; for example, where a CIO identifies an increase in phishing activity but lacks a formal route to escalate the risk, a subsequent successful attack may result in financial loss and a reportable data breach, an avoidable governance failure rather than a purely technical one.
Research from Charity Digital consistently shows that charities which involve digital leaders at board level achieve higher levels of digital maturity, respond more quickly to incidents, and experience fewer critical system failures. This is increasingly important because technology risk is no longer confined to IT teams; it is organisational risk, and CIOs play a vital role in translating technical threats into clear, actionable insight that trustees can understand and act upon.
Actionable Insights: Practical Governance Actions for London Charities
Establish a Governance Framework:
Develop clear policies, roles, and responsibilities for trustees and senior staff. Conduct regular governance reviews and training.
Maintain a Live Risk Register:
Identify, assess, and monitor risks. Ensure the register is discussed at every board meeting and actions are tracked.
Regular Audits and Reviews:
Schedule independent audits of finances, operations, and data protection practices. Use findings to improve controls and transparency.
Strengthen Data Protection Controls:
Implement GDPR-compliant processes for data collection, storage, and sharing. Train staff and volunteers on data security and privacy. Apply least-privilege access, MFA, secure data sharing, and regular training for staff and volunteers.
Enhance Board Reporting:
Provide concise, relevant risk reports to the board. Focus on key risks, mitigation efforts, and strategic priorities. Translate technical risks into impact-based summaries trustees can act on.
Engage the CIO in Governance:
Involve the CIO in strategic planning, risk discussions, and compliance oversight. Leverage their expertise to drive digital innovation and resilience. Include IT leadership in strategic planning, incident reviews, and compliance oversight.
Foster a Culture of Accountability:
Encourage open dialogue about risks, compliance, and ethical dilemmas. Promote transparency and learning from incidents.
Conclusion: Building Resilient Charities Through Robust Governance
For London and Greater London charities, strong governance, compliance, and risk management are not barriers to agility, they are enablers of sustainable impact. When trustees, executives, and CIOs work together, charities are better equipped to protect beneficiaries, secure funding, and adapt to an increasingly digital operating environment.
Medium-sized charities that invest in governance maturity today place themselves in a stronger position to grow responsibly, withstand disruption, and continue delivering vital services across the capital.