Our Guide to Choosing Key Performance Indicators for CIO's
Measuring success using thoughtfully chosen Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) ensures that IT investments are purposeful, impactful and directly supportive of organisational goals.
Interested in our Cybersecurity Framework?
Visit our article on how to organise an effective cybersecurity strategy to download a copy of our framework.
Technological advancements progress rapidly, rendering previously state-of-the-art operating systems obsolete. Microsoft has officially announced that support for Windows Server 2016 will end on January 12, 2027. This deadline is of critical importance for organisations still relying on this platform.
After this date, Microsoft will discontinue the provision of security updates and patches, leaving business systems exposed to potential vulnerabilities. The implications extend beyond missing out on new features – continuing to operate unsupported software substantially heightens the risk of cyberattacks and data breaches.
If your organisation remains on Windows Server 2016, it is imperative to begin planning your upgrade now. With approximately one year remaining until the end of support, delaying preparations could result in rushed decisions, increased costs, and operational disruptions.
Understanding the Security Implications
Once support concludes, the safeguards offered by ongoing security updates and patches will no longer be available. Microsoft will cease to address newly discovered bugs or vulnerabilities, making unsupported systems prime targets for malicious actors who exploit unpatched weaknesses.
Operating legacy systems places IT administrators in a challenging position. The absence of vendor support makes defending against emerging threats exceedingly difficult, undermines compliance with industry standards, and increases the risk of unsuccessful audits.
Furthermore, customer data stored on servers running unsupported operating systems becomes susceptible to theft and ransomware attacks. The financial and reputational consequences of a security breach far outweigh the investment required for an upgrade. Continuing to use unsupported systems is analogous to operating a vehicle without insurance – failure is not a matter of if, but when.
The Case for Cloud Migration
With the end-of-support deadline imminent, organisations must determine whether to invest in new physical servers running the latest Windows Server releases or transition their infrastructure to the cloud. Procuring new hardware and software entails significant upfront costs and commits you to a fixed capacity throughout the typical five-year mainstream support period, plus an additional five years for Long-Term Servicing Channel (LTSC) releases.
Conversely, migrating to the cloud presents a flexible and scalable alternative. Leading platforms such as Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) enable organisations to utilise virtualised computing resources – including servers and storage – that can be adjusted according to demand. This model shifts IT expenditures from capital investments to operational expenses, allowing businesses to pay only for the resources they consume.
Cloud solutions also enhance reliability and Disaster Recovery capabilities, alleviating concerns regarding hardware failures within on-premise server environments. The responsibility for managing and upgrading physical infrastructure is assumed by the cloud provider, empowering your IT team to focus on strategic initiatives that drive organisational growth.
Analyse Your Current Workloads
Before moving to the cloud, it’s essential to know what you’re working with. Take inventory of all applications running on your Windows Server 2016 machines. While some are cloud-ready, others may need updates or reconfiguration.
Identify which workloads are critical to your daily operations and prioritise them in your migration plan. You may also discover applications you no longer need, making this an ideal time to streamline and clean up your environment.
When in doubt, consult with your software vendors to confirm compatibility, as they might have specific requirements for newer operating systems. Gathering this information early helps you to avoid surprises during the actual migration.
Create a Phased Migration Plan
When transitioning to a new system, moving everything at once is risky, ‘big bang’ migrations often cause downtime and confusion. The best approach is a phased migration to manage risk effectively. Begin with low-impact workloads to test the process, then proceed to medium and high-impact workloads once you’re confident everything runs smoothly.
Set a realistic timeline that beats the server upgrade deadline by a significant margin, and then work backward from the end-of-support date. This approach allows for plenty of buffer time for testing and troubleshooting, since rushing migrations often results in mistakes and security gaps.
Communicate the schedule to your staff clearly, they need to know when maintenance windows will occur, so that they can also manage their workflows effectively. Managing expectations is just as important as managing servers, and you don’t want to get in your own way. A smooth transition requires everyone to be informed and on the same page.
Test and Validate
Once you migrate a workload, it’s essential to verify that it functions as expected. Key questions to ask include: does the application launch correctly? Can users access their data without permission errors? Testing is the most critical phase of any migration.
After migration, run extensive performance benchmarks to compare the new system with the old one. The cloud should offer equal or better speed, and if things are slow, you might need to adjust resources. Optimisation will be a normal part of the migration process, until you find the perfect balance that works for you.
The summarised steps for a successful migration include:
- Audit all current hardware and software assets
- Choose between an on-premise upgrade or a cloud migration
- Back up all data securely before making changes
- Test applications thoroughly in the new environment
- Do not declare victory until users confirm everything is working.
The Cost of Inaction
Disregarding the end-of-support deadline is not a sustainable strategy. Some organisations may consider postponing their migration until the last possible moment; however, such an approach carries significant risk. Outdated and unsupported systems are prime targets for cybercriminals, who frequently employ automated tools to identify and exploit vulnerabilities.
Continuing to operate Windows Server 2016 beyond the extended support period may necessitate the purchase of Microsoft’s ‘Extended Security Updates.’ While this service is available, it comes at a substantial cost, with prices increasing annually. Rather than serving as a viable long-term solution, these escalating expenses function more as a penalty for delay, underscoring the importance of timely action.
Act Now to Modernise Your Infrastructure
If your organisation still relies on Windows Server 2016, the end of support marks a pivotal moment for your IT strategy, upgrading your technology stack is no longer optional. Whether you choose new hardware or a cloud solution, decisive action is required.
Take this opportunity to enhance your legacy system’s security and efficiency, ensuring your modern organisation runs on a modern infrastructure. Don’t let time compromise your data’s safety, plan your migration today and safeguard your future.
Concerned about the approaching Windows Server 2016 end-of-support deadline? We specialise in smooth migrations to the cloud and modern server environments. Let us take care of the technical heavy lifting, contact us today to begin your upgrade plan.